There is no verification which can be put forwards to support the religious experiences that people claim to experience. Atheists cannot use inaccuracies in holy books as proof that God does not exist, as it is possible that such a god exists who has never been mentioned in religious texts.
Religious texts cannot be said to act as adequate proof that God exists, but cannot be used to disprove its existence either.
But there are in fact several directions from which it can be challenged. The only way its existence could be proven would be if it desired humankind to prove its existence.
But from such an experience alone one can hardly infer anything so definite as the God of theism. Richard Swinburne was a key supporter of the inductive argument from religious experience for the existence of God.
The person with theistic religious experience is assured that it is different.
Also, people experience God in more common and simpler ways religious experience, such as miracles are rare for example praying, as people may feel as if they are communicating to God, and therefore feel that they have a special connection, so therefore those individuals claim that God exists.
In wholeness, Swinburne is attempting to put the burden of proof with those who doubt religious experiences — it is very hard to prove that something does not exist than if it does.
It is given unity most obviously by possession of perceptible limits and boundaries and by the manner in which its several surfaces can be seen and felt to connect with one another.
The theist could insist that a much too crude notion of "interpretation" has so far been used, one that suggests, falsely, that there is a merely external and almost arbitrary relation between having and interpreting an experience. In conclusion, the presence of religious experiences can be dated back thousands of years, of which many accounts can be seen within the Bible.
Verifiability of Religious Experience If someone claims to have discovered, perceived, become aware of an ordinary sort of object, we usually know what to do about checking his claim. It is argued that this historical development provides material for a more adequate argument to God—one in which the risks of fantasy and subjectivism are much reduced.
Due to the fact that there are a vast number of claimed experiences from numerous faiths, it is very hard to define them in terms of common themes.
We cannot be intellectually compelled to posit God if more economical and naturalistic explanations can be found—psychoanalytic accounts, it might be, or accounts in terms of individual suggestibility or the influence of religious expectations or tradition. On the other hand, to point this out is to draw attention only to the risk, not to the certainty, of being wrong.
If an entity is experienced, then it must exist. So why should we not believe that same for religious experiences? It can be argued that because of the fact they are experienced over such a broad range of faiths and date back centuries, with re-occurring features, and then we cannot deny the fact that religious experiences must be real.RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE, ARGUMENT FOR THE EXISTENCE OF GOD Arguments from Religious Experience show remarkable diversity, (a) in the sorts of experience taken as data for the argument, (b) in the structure of the inference itself, and (c) in the alleged conclusion, whether to a vague Presence, an Infinite Being, or the God of traditional.
Although, a religious experience is beneficial to some people as proof that God exists, there are in fact numerous people who have been firmly raised with the view that logic and reason reign above all. Existence of God Essay.
Descartes states two arguments attempting to prove God's existence, the Trademark argument and the traditional Cosmological argument. Although his arguments are strong and relatively truthful, they do no prove the existence of God. Analyse the Argument of the Existence of God from Religious Experience;.
Atheists cannot use inaccuracies in holy books as proof that God does not exist, as it is possible that such a god exists who has never been mentioned in religious texts.
This means it is impossible to say whether the existence of God could be proven without knowing whether God wants people to know it is real (Castor 45). opinion essay. Feb 04, · For religious believers, the occurrence of these experiences is the most convincing evidence/proof for the existence of God.
A key concept that is associated with religious experiences is that they are essentially personal and unique; usually arguing that God manifests Himself in some way to make his presence known in the. Feb 04, · Questions which seemingly have no answer but do cause a problem to the argument from religious experience for the existence of God.
In conclusion, it is true that the argument from religious experience is essential in the debate regarding the existence of God/a divine entity.Download